Citizens' Oversight Projects

 

CopsWiki | COPs Videos | Calendar of Events

   Hot News

Press Conference and Rally -- 25 Apr 2008

Our rally to put pressure on Blackwater to pull the plug on this project too! We won on their first ridiculous project in Potrero We can do the same here!

Ray Lutz explains the situation on Democracy Now! with Amy Goodman:

   COPs Collaboration

   Other News

EXAMPLE: Raymond Lutz, Founder of COPs, discovered that the City of El Cajon was playing videos made by David Barton (the Texas Evangelical, and recently the Vice Chair of the Texas Republican Party) on the City-Funded Government Access Channel. The films have been pulled, but the taxpayer should be reimbursed nearly $20,000 by Bob McClellan who was the driving force behing this unethical behavior. We have submitted a request to the San Diego County District Attorney's office to open a Grand Jury investigation into this illegal behavior!

For details, and a full rundown of the interaction between the COPs and the City, see the collaboration page Government Access Channel

   Mission

Holding feet to the fire

Officials in office today are frequently in bed with businesses, churches, special interests and others in the area. They sometimes sneak in decisions that may never reach the light of day, to line their own pockets, improve the position of their friends, or promote their own religious or partisan beliefs. This sort of corrupt behavior is unfortunately more prevalent than can be at first imagined, and yet, putting ethical Democrats in office is all but impossible. And to top it off, local media is frequently just as corrupt, with no desire to point out the ineffective operation of these bodies. We are left with only one option, police these government positions, 'holding their feet to the fire,' making sure we review their decisions and make sure that bad decisions are revealed to the media and the public. How do we do this?

Citizens' Oversight Panels (COPs)

We need an organizing principle to help us police the behavior of these boards, councils, and candidates. Here, I will say 'body,' although it may be an individual official, such as a assembly, house, or senate official. For each such body, a set of volunteers will serve on a Citizens' Oversight Panel. The Panel would attend their body's meetings, if possible, or else monitor their actions, and become well versed in the nuances of the politics and decisions that are being made. Unsuccessful candidates for those bodies or seats are an obvious first set of members for the panels. Other activists in the area may also find themselves drawn to particular a board, council, or official, and may wish to become a part of that panel. If we have enough people involved, we can have elections to the leading positions on each panel, with other volunteers welcomed to be a part of any panel.

Benefits:

Participation

This proposal will only be effective if the workload is shared among many people. What we don't want are the same key players on every single COP. Each COP should have at a minimum, a Chair and Co-chair, and once we get things rolling, the Immediate Past Chair. Any other club members or associates may be a member of the COP. It is preferred if the Chair and Co-chair do not serve on multiple COPs. Unsuccessful candidates of past elections are prime candidates for COP membership.

Duties of COP Participants

The amount of work will vary significantly depending on the schedule of body meetings and the extent of the agenda of each meeting, as well as how corrupt the group is. Indeed, federal and state officials will necessarily be monitored from afar, by monitoring voting records and other actions.

Previously unsuccessful candidates to those bodies will find participation on the COP provide a high-profile citizen action position that will keep their head above the fray. A short summary of the actions of the body can be presented at each club meeting to keep others informed, and to get advice on how to proceed with interaction, media exposure, or possible legal action. However, due to the rate of most local bodies, decisions on most actions will necessarily be made at the level of the COP with the input of Club Board.

Candidate Selection

One of my observations about the recent elections is that in some cases, I saw much more advertising and promotion during the primary than during the general election. Most of the thrashing around in the primary was a total waste of time. The realities of lop-sided voter registration made the primary an exercise in futility.

This program will allow us to more easily determine our top choice for any elected position, board seat, etc. based on who is active on the COP, and how productive they have been. If we can avoid unnecessary expenditure during the primary, more resources can be devoted to the general election. I'm not certain how to handle it, but a initial selection in a caucus can reduce the expenditures and consternation in the primary. The COP for that governing position can be a help in this process.

Listserve

At this time, the Citizens' Oversight "COPS" list will be used for discussion and announcements. You are welcome to request subscription to our emailing list for COPS-related announcements and discussions. However, we do request that you introduce yourself first.

   Meetings

http://www.CitizensOversight.org

For information call: 619-820-5321

View our entire calendar here! (Particularly if we've neglected to update the notice above.)

   Contact Us

Donations always accepted!

Mail to:

Citizens' Oversight Projects
P.O. Box 252
El Cajon, CA 92022

Phone: 619-820-5321
Email: info -AT- citizensoversight.org (Replace the -AT- with the @ symbol.)
Web: http://www.citizensoversight.org

   GET INVOLVED!

-- RaymondLutz - 23 Sep 2007